On January 8, 2026, the First Department issued a decision in Continuum Energy Tech., LLC v. Iron Oak, Inc. (USA), 2026 NY Slip Op. 00053, holding that a motion to strike was deficient because it was not supported by an affirmation of good faith . . . Continue reading Motion to Strike Fails for Lack of Affirmation of Good Faith
On November 20, 2025, the First Department issued a decision in Sherman v. Zampella, 2025 NY Slip Op. 06397, holding that a discovery sanction was inappropriate because of insufficient evidence of an intentional refusal to provide discovery . . . Continue reading Sanction Inappropriate Because of Insufficient Evidence of Intentional Refusal to Provide Discovery
On October 15, 2025, Justice Patel of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Jfurti, LLC v. Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovky & Popeo, P.C., 2025 NY Slip Op. 33977(U), dismissing a Judiciary Law Section 487 claim because it was brought against the client, not its counsel . . . Continue reading Judiciary Law Section 487 Claim Must Be Brought Against Counsel, Not Client
On October 23, 2025, the First Department issued a decision in Peck v. Milbank LLP, 2025 NY Slip Op. 05895, dismissing a Judiciary Law Section 487 claim for failure adequately to allege deceptive acts . . . Continue reading Judiciary Law Section 487 Claim Dismissed for Failure Adequately to Allege Deceptive Acts
On September 5, 2025, Justice Borrok of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Oasis Invs. II Master Fund Ltd. v. Mo, 2025 NY Slip Op. 33342(U), striking the defendants’ answers as a sanction for discovery misconduct . . . Continue reading Answers Struck as Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
On July 28, 2025, Justice Chan of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in RSM US LLP v. Notes, 2025 NY Slip Op. 32971(U), rejecting a JHO’s award of sanctions because of the movant’s failure to meet and confer as required by the Commercial Division rules . . . Continue reading Sanctions Award Rejected for Failure to Meet and Confer as Required by Commercial Division Rules
On August 27, 2025, the Second Department issued a decision in Long Chen v. Clean Air Car Serv. & Parking Corp., 2025 NY Slip Op. 04777, holding that a plaintiff’s loss at summary judgment was an insufficient basis, without more, to impose sanctions under 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 . . . Continue reading Loss at Summary Judgment Insufficient Basis for Imposing Sanctions
On July 23, 2025, the Second Department issued a decision in Whelan v. Busiello, 2025 NY Slip Op. 04272, holding the Rule 130 sanctions must be paid to the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection, not to the aggrieved party . . . Continue reading Rule 130 Sanctions Must be Paid to Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection, Not to Aggrieved Party
On May 13, 2025, the First Department issued a decision in Five Star Elec. Corp. v. Trustees of Columbia Univ., 2025 NY Slip Op. 02872, holding that a trial court did not err in striking a complaint as a sanction for delayed responses to discovery demands . . . Continue reading Complaint Struck for Delay in Responding to Discovery Demands
On January 22, 2025, the Second Department issued a decision in Gordon v. Field, 2025 NY Slip Op. 00308, holding that spoliation sanctions are unavailable when there was no duty to preserve evidence for litigation . . . Continue reading Spoliation Sanctions Unavailable When No Duty to Preserve Evidence for Litigation Existed
