Judiciary Law Section 487 Claim Must Be Brought Against Counsel, Not Client

Judiciary Law Section 487 Claim Must Be Brought Against Counsel, Not Client

On October 15, 2025, Justice Patel of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Jfurti, LLC v. Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovky & Popeo, P.C., 2025 NY Slip Op. 33977(U), dismissing a Judiciary Law Section 487 claim because it was brought against the client, not its counsel . . . Continue reading Judiciary Law Section 487 Claim Must Be Brought Against Counsel, Not Client

Sanctions Award Rejected for Failure to Meet and Confer as Required by Commercial Division Rules

Sanctions Award Rejected for Failure to Meet and Confer as Required by Commercial Division Rules

On July 28, 2025, Justice Chan of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in RSM US LLP v. Notes, 2025 NY Slip Op. 32971(U), rejecting a JHO’s award of sanctions because of the movant’s failure to meet and confer as required by the Commercial Division rules . . . Continue reading Sanctions Award Rejected for Failure to Meet and Confer as Required by Commercial Division Rules