Nail and Mail Service Inadequate for Lack of Attempt to Service at the Defendant’s Business Address
Commercial Case Notes / Service of Process

Nail and Mail Service Inadequate for Lack of Attempt to Service at the Defendant’s Business Address

On April 17, 2023, Justice Ruchelsman of the Kings County Commercial Division issued a decision in Goldman Sachs Bank USA v. Wagschal, 2023 NY Slip Op. 31263(U), holding that nail and mail service was inadequate because the process server failed to attempt service at the defendant’s business address . . . Continue reading Nail and Mail Service Inadequate for Lack of Attempt to Service at the Defendant’s Business Address

Bare Denial of Receipt of Service Insufficient to Overcome Presumptive Validity of Affidavit of Service
Commercial Case Notes / Service of Process

Bare Denial of Receipt of Service Insufficient to Overcome Presumptive Validity of Affidavit of Service

On April 26, 2023, the Second Department issued a decision in U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Catalano, 2023 NY Slip Op. 02139, holding that a bare denial of receipt of service was insufficient to overcome the presumptive validity of an affidavit of service . . . Continue reading Bare Denial of Receipt of Service Insufficient to Overcome Presumptive Validity of Affidavit of Service

Denial of Receipt of Service Insufficient to Overcome Presumptive Validity of Affidavit of Service
Commercial Case Notes / Service of Process

Denial of Receipt of Service Insufficient to Overcome Presumptive Validity of Affidavit of Service

On April 19, 2023, the Second Department issued a decision in Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Williams, 2023 NY Slip Op. 01982, holding the denial of receipt of service was insufficient to overcome the presumptive validity of an affidavit of service . . . Continue reading Denial of Receipt of Service Insufficient to Overcome Presumptive Validity of Affidavit of Service

Court Grants Additional Time to Serve Based on the Interests of Justice Despite Failure to Prove Due Diligence
Commercial Case Notes / Service of Process

Court Grants Additional Time to Serve Based on the Interests of Justice Despite Failure to Prove Due Diligence

On January 3, 2023, Justice Reed of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Deutsche Bank Sec. Inc. v. 683 Capital Partners LP, 2023 NY Slip Op. 50002(U), granting additional time to serve in the interests of justice despite failure to prove due diligence . . . Continue reading Court Grants Additional Time to Serve Based on the Interests of Justice Despite Failure to Prove Due Diligence

Court Denies Extra Time for Service Based on Lack of Diligence
Commercial Case Notes / Service of Process

Court Denies Extra Time for Service Based on Lack of Diligence

On January 3, 2023, Justice Reed of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Ardel Constr. & Design Group, Corp. v. VBG 990 AOA LLC, 2023 NY Slip Op. 50003(U), denying a motion to extend time to serve because of the plaintiff’s failure to diligently attempt to serve within the 120 days set by statute . . . Continue reading Court Denies Extra Time for Service Based on Lack of Diligence

Defendants Waived Defense of Improper Service of Process by Failing to Plead it with Particularity
Commercial Case Notes / Motion to Dismiss / Service of Process

Defendants Waived Defense of Improper Service of Process by Failing to Plead it with Particularity

On September 7, 2022, Justice Cohen of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Continuum Energy Tech., LLC v. Iron Oak, Inc. (USA), 2022 NY Slip Op. 33000(U), holding that defendants waive the defense of improper service by failing to plead it with particularity . . . Continue reading Defendants Waived Defense of Improper Service of Process by Failing to Plead it with Particularity

Defendant Who Used Address on Guaranty Estopped From Denying That He Resided at that Address in Action to Recover on Guaranty
Commercial Case Notes / Service of Process

Defendant Who Used Address on Guaranty Estopped From Denying That He Resided at that Address in Action to Recover on Guaranty

On August 17, 2022, the Second Department issued a decision in Hudson Val. Bank, N.A. v. Eagle Trading, 2022 NY Slip Op. 04956, holding that a defendant who used an address on a guaranty was estopped from denying that he resided at that address in an action to enforce the guaranty . . . Continue reading Defendant Who Used Address on Guaranty Estopped From Denying That He Resided at that Address in Action to Recover on Guaranty