Motion to Disqualify Denied Due to Lack of Relationship Between Matters in Which Counsel was Engaged

Motion to Disqualify Denied Due to Lack of Relationship Between Matters in Which Counsel was Engaged

On May 3, 2024, the Fourth Department issued a decision in Consumers Beverages, Inc. v. Kavcon Dev. LLC, 2024 NY Slip Op. 02397, holding that a motion to disqualify counsel failed because of an insufficient connection between the matters in which counsel was engaged . . . Continue reading Motion to Disqualify Denied Due to Lack of Relationship Between Matters in Which Counsel was Engaged

Court Refuses to Disqualify Counsel Because of Insufficient Similarity of Past and Current Engagements

Court Refuses to Disqualify Counsel Because of Insufficient Similarity of Past and Current Engagements

On February 15, 2024, Justice Ruchelsman of the Kings County Commercial Division issued a decision in Zomongo.TV USA Inc. v. Capital Advance Servs., LLC, 2024 NY Slip Op. 30508(U), refusing to disqualify counsel because of insufficient similarity of past and current engagements . . . Continue reading Court Refuses to Disqualify Counsel Because of Insufficient Similarity of Past and Current Engagements

Attorney-Witness Rule Applies Only if Counsel’s Testimony is Necessary, Not Just Useful, to the Moving Party’s Case

Attorney-Witness Rule Applies Only if Counsel’s Testimony is Necessary, Not Just Useful, to the Moving Party’s Case

On July 26, 2023, the Second Department issued a decision in Kingston Check Cashing Corp. v. Nussbaum Yates Berg Klein & Wolpow, LLP, 2023 NY Slip Op. 03913, holding that the attorney-witness rule applies only when counsel’s testimony is necessary, not just useful, to the moving party’s case . . . Continue reading Attorney-Witness Rule Applies Only if Counsel’s Testimony is Necessary, Not Just Useful, to the Moving Party’s Case

In-House Counsel That Has Not Appeared in an Action Cannot be the Subject of a Motion for Disqualification

In-House Counsel That Has Not Appeared in an Action Cannot be the Subject of a Motion for Disqualification

On April 17, 2023, Justice Ruchelsman of the Kings County Commercial Division issued a decision in Joseph v. Rassi, 2023 NY Slip Op. 31261(U), holding that in-house counsel that has not appeared in an action cannot be the subject of a motion for disqualification . . . Continue reading In-House Counsel That Has Not Appeared in an Action Cannot be the Subject of a Motion for Disqualification