Consolidation Based on Overlapping Discovery Denied Due to Insufficiently Similar Questions of Law or Fact

Consolidation Based on Overlapping Discovery Denied Due to Insufficiently Similar Questions of Law or Fact

On October 8, 2024, Justice Ruchelsman of the Kings County Commercial Division issued a decision in Harkins v. Stern, 2024 NY Slip Op. 33599(U), denying a motion for consolidation because of overlapping discovery where there were insufficiently similar questions of law or fact . . . Continue reading Consolidation Based on Overlapping Discovery Denied Due to Insufficiently Similar Questions of Law or Fact

Claim That Cannot Survive Summary Judgment Lacks a Substantial Basis Under New York’s Anti-SLAPP Law

Claim That Cannot Survive Summary Judgment Lacks a Substantial Basis Under New York’s Anti-SLAPP Law

On October 7, 2024, Justice Schecter of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in TRB Acquisitions LLC v. Yedid, 2024 NY Slip Op. 33565(U), holding that a claim that cannot survive summary judgment lacks a substantial basis under New York’s anti-SLAPP law . . . Continue reading Claim That Cannot Survive Summary Judgment Lacks a Substantial Basis Under New York’s Anti-SLAPP Law

Receiver’s Fees Capped by CPLR § 8004(a) Despite Court Order Allowing Payment at Receiver’s Usual Rate

Receiver’s Fees Capped by CPLR § 8004(a) Despite Court Order Allowing Payment at Receiver’s Usual Rate

On August 2, 2024, Justice Cohen of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Law Off. of Mark S. Helweil v. Karambelas, 2024 NY Slip Op. 32693(U), holding that a receiver’s fees were capped by CPLR § 8004(a) despite s court order allowing payment at the receiver’s usual rate . . . Continue reading Receiver’s Fees Capped by CPLR § 8004(a) Despite Court Order Allowing Payment at Receiver’s Usual Rate

Motion to Intervene Not Untimely So Long As Existing Litigants Not Unduly Prejudiced

Motion to Intervene Not Untimely So Long As Existing Litigants Not Unduly Prejudiced

On July 26, 2024, the Fourth Department issued a decision in Resetarits Constr. Corp. v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 2024 NY Slip Op. 04019, holding that a motion to intervene was not untimely because the existing litigants were not prejudiced . . . Continue reading Motion to Intervene Not Untimely So Long As Existing Litigants Not Unduly Prejudiced

Insufficient Similarity of Suits Defeats Motion to Dismiss in Favor of Prior Pending Action

Insufficient Similarity of Suits Defeats Motion to Dismiss in Favor of Prior Pending Action

On July 30, 2024, Justice Reed of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Dragons 516 Ltd. v. SMI USA Group LLC, 2024 NY Slip Op. 50977(U), holding that insufficient similarity of suits defeated a motion to dismiss in favor of a prior pending action . . . Continue reading Insufficient Similarity of Suits Defeats Motion to Dismiss in Favor of Prior Pending Action

Affirmation Inadmissible Because It Failed to Use Language Required by CPLR 2106

Affirmation Inadmissible Because It Failed to Use Language Required by CPLR 2106

On June 6, 2024, the First Department issued a decision in Great Lakes Ins. SE v. American S.S. Owners Mut. Protection & Indem. Assn. Inc., 2024 NY Slip Op. 03083, holding that an affirmation was inadmissible because it failed to use the language required by CPLR 2106 . . . Continue reading Affirmation Inadmissible Because It Failed to Use Language Required by CPLR 2106

Absent Substitution, a Successor in Interest Can Only Participate in an Action Under the Predecessor’s Name

Absent Substitution, a Successor in Interest Can Only Participate in an Action Under the Predecessor’s Name

On May 22, 2024, the Second Department issued a decision in Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Welsh, 2024 NY Slip Op. 02838, holding that absent substitution, a successor in interest can only participate in an action under the name of its predecessor’s name . . . Continue reading Absent Substitution, a Successor in Interest Can Only Participate in an Action Under the Predecessor’s Name