All Lundin PLLC Blogs

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

No Dismissal in Favor of Prior Pending Action Because of Insufficient Overlap of Issues

On October 17, 2025, Justice Cohen of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in CPIF Bloomington, LLC v. Prager, 2025 NY Slip Op. 34027(U), declining to dismiss an action in favor of a prior pending action because of an insufficient overlap of issues . . . Continue reading No Dismissal in Favor of Prior Pending Action Because of Insufficient Overlap of Issues

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

Party Bound By Agreement He Signed, Despite Claims That it Was Not the Agreement He Intended to Sign

On October 15, 2025, Justice Bannon of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Vaporvm Holding Corp. v. Fayazi, 2025 NY Slip Op. 34028(U), holding that a party was bound by an agreement he signed, despite claims that it was not the agreement he intended to sign . . . Continue reading Party Bound By Agreement He Signed, Despite Claims That it Was Not the Agreement He Intended to Sign

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

Judiciary Law Section 487 Claim Must Be Brought Against Counsel, Not Client

On October 15, 2025, Justice Patel of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Jfurti, LLC v. Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovky & Popeo, P.C., 2025 NY Slip Op. 33977(U), dismissing a Judiciary Law Section 487 claim because it was brought against the client, not its counsel . . . Continue reading Judiciary Law Section 487 Claim Must Be Brought Against Counsel, Not Client

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

Under Internal Affairs Doctrine, Accounting Under New York Law Not Available for Caymans Entity

On October 7, 2025, Justice Jamieson of the Westchester County Commercial Division issued a decision in Guang Huang v. Jingjing Zhou, 2025 NY Slip Op. 51696(U), holding that under the internal affairs doctrine, an accounting under New York law was unavailable in an action relating to a Caymans entity . . . Continue reading Under Internal Affairs Doctrine, Accounting Under New York Law Not Available for Caymans Entity

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint Denied Because Amounts Owed Not Clear on Face of Guaranties

On October 10, 2025, Justice Bannon of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in CMTG JPM Term Funding LLC v. Chetrit, 2025 NY Slip Op. 33991(U), denying summary judgment in lieu of complaint on two guaranties because the amount owed was not clear on the face of the guaranties . . . Continue reading Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint Denied Because Amounts Owed Not Clear on Face of Guaranties

Appellate Division First Department Courthouse

Service of Process Valid if Made as Required by Contract, Even if Defendant Did Not Receive Documents

On October 30, 2025, the First Department issued a decision in Diamond Films Netherlands Cooperatief U.A. v. TV Azteca S.A.B. De C.V., 2025 NY Slip Op. 06017, holding that service of process was valid if made as required by contract, even if the defendant did not receive the documents . . . Continue reading Service of Process Valid if Made as Required by Contract, Even if Defendant Did Not Receive Documents

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

Implied Covenant Claim Based on Unilaterally and Arbitrarily Setting Repayment Terms Alleged Survives Dismissal

On October 3, 2025, Justice Bannon of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Skyline Bus. Capital LLC v. Tech Ready Mix Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op. 33820(U), holding that an implied covenant claim based on unilaterally and arbitrarily setting repayment terms was adequately alleged . . . Continue reading Implied Covenant Claim Based on Unilaterally and Arbitrarily Setting Repayment Terms Alleged Survives Dismissal