Sanctions Award Rejected for Failure to Meet and Confer as Required by Commercial Division Rules

Sanctions Award Rejected for Failure to Meet and Confer as Required by Commercial Division Rules

On July 28, 2025, Justice Chan of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in RSM US LLP v. Notes, 2025 NY Slip Op. 32971(U), rejecting a JHO’s award of sanctions because of the movant’s failure to meet and confer as required by the Commercial Division rules . . . Continue reading Sanctions Award Rejected for Failure to Meet and Confer as Required by Commercial Division Rules

Referee Did Not Err in Not Holding an Evidentiary Hearing Because Defendant Had An Opportunity to Respond to the Plaintiff’s Arguments in Writing

Referee Did Not Err in Not Holding an Evidentiary Hearing Because Defendant Had An Opportunity to Respond to the Plaintiff’s Arguments in Writing

On August 13, 2025, the Second Department issued a decision in Bank of Am., N.A. v. ABC Realty Holdings, Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op. 04616, holding that a referee did not err in deciding not to hold an evidentiary hearing because the defendant had an opportunity to respond to the plaintiff’s arguments in writing . . . Continue reading Referee Did Not Err in Not Holding an Evidentiary Hearing Because Defendant Had An Opportunity to Respond to the Plaintiff’s Arguments in Writing

Court Should Not Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute if There is a Reasonable Excuse for the Delay

Court Should Not Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute if There is a Reasonable Excuse for the Delay

On August 6, 2025, the Second Department issued a decision in James B. Nutter & Co. v. Hutson, 2025 NY Slip Op. 04557, holding that a court should not dismiss an action for failure to prosecute if there is a reasonable excuse for the delay . . . Continue reading Court Should Not Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute if There is a Reasonable Excuse for the Delay

That Plaintiff Was Aware of Potential Claim Before Bringing Suit No Bar to Later Moving to Amend to Add it

That Plaintiff Was Aware of Potential Claim Before Bringing Suit No Bar to Later Moving to Amend to Add it

On June 5, 2025, Justice Chan of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Baric Commons REO, LLC v. Gross, 2025 NY Slip Op. 32087(U), holding that a motion to amend to add a claim is not barred by the fact that the plaintiff was aware of the claim before it initiated the lawsuit . . . Continue reading That Plaintiff Was Aware of Potential Claim Before Bringing Suit No Bar to Later Moving to Amend to Add it