All Lundin PLLC Blogs

Kings County Courthouse (Justices Boddie, Knipel and Ruchelsman)

Court Reforms Contract on Summary Judgment Based on Course of Performance and Avoidance of Absurd Results

On April 23, 2026, Justice Boddie of the Kings County Commercial Division issued a decision in Big City Outdoor, LLC v. JTRE 23 WS LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op. 50579(U), reforming a contract on summary judgment based on the parties’ course of performance and the avoidance of absurd results . . . Continue reading Court Reforms Contract on Summary Judgment Based on Course of Performance and Avoidance of Absurd Results

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

New Controlling Member Not Entitled to Pre-Change of Control Privileged Communications if They Related to a Dispute in Which Old and New Controlling Members Were Adverse

On April 9, 2026, Justice Masley of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Chaowai 101 AOA LLC v. 101 A of A LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op. 31493(U), holding that the new controlling member of a business was not entitled to pre-change of control privileged communications if they related to a dispute in which the old and new controlling members were adverse . . . Continue reading New Controlling Member Not Entitled to Pre-Change of Control Privileged Communications if They Related to a Dispute in Which Old and New Controlling Members Were Adverse

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

Court May Not, In Confirming Arbitral Award, Award Pre-Award Interest if the Arbitrator Did Not

On April 9, 2026, Justice Patel of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Dilascia v. Lemonis, 2026 NY Slip Op. 31505(U), holding that a court may not grant pre-award interest if the arbitrator declines to do so . . . Continue reading Court May Not, In Confirming Arbitral Award, Award Pre-Award Interest if the Arbitrator Did Not

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

If Claims Are Subject to Arbitration, the Remedy is a Stay, Not Dismissal

On April 9, 2026, Justice Borrok of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Otterbourg P.C. v. Cretella, 2026 NY Slip Op. 31506(U), holding that if claims are subject to arbitration, the proper procedural remedy is a stay pending arbitration, not dismissal . . . Continue reading If Claims Are Subject to Arbitration, the Remedy is a Stay, Not Dismissal