All Lundin PLLC Blogs

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

Plaintiff Not Entitled to Lost Rent and Revenue for Breach of Construction Contract

On July 25, 2025, Justice Masley of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in BLDG 44 Developers LLC v. Pace Companies N.Y., LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op. 32881(U), holding that a plaintiff was not entitled to consequential damages of lost rent and revenue for breach of a construction contract . . . Continue reading Plaintiff Not Entitled to Lost Rent and Revenue for Breach of Construction Contract

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

Discovery Motion Denied for Failure to Comply With Commercial Division Discovery Dispute Rules

On August 8, 2025, Justice Reed of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Slice Wireless Servs., LLC v. Yakubov, 2025 NY Slip Op. 51257(U), denying a discovery motion for failure to comply with the Commercial Division discovery dispute rules . . . Continue reading Discovery Motion Denied for Failure to Comply With Commercial Division Discovery Dispute Rules

Appellate Division, Second Department Courthouse

Motion for Summary Judgment Before the Close of Discovery Not Premature When Non-Movant Cannot Identify Additional Discovery Needed to Oppose the Motion

On August 13, 2025, the Second Department issued a decision in AccessLex Inst. v. Clunis, 2025 NY Slip Op. 04613, holding that a motion for summary judgment made before the close of discovery is not premature when the non-movant cannot identify additional discovery needed to oppose the motion . . . Continue reading Motion for Summary Judgment Before the Close of Discovery Not Premature When Non-Movant Cannot Identify Additional Discovery Needed to Oppose the Motion

Appellate Division, Second Department Courthouse

Referee Did Not Err in Not Holding an Evidentiary Hearing Because Defendant Had An Opportunity to Respond to the Plaintiff’s Arguments in Writing

On August 13, 2025, the Second Department issued a decision in Bank of Am., N.A. v. ABC Realty Holdings, Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op. 04616, holding that a referee did not err in deciding not to hold an evidentiary hearing because the defendant had an opportunity to respond to the plaintiff’s arguments in writing . . . Continue reading Referee Did Not Err in Not Holding an Evidentiary Hearing Because Defendant Had An Opportunity to Respond to the Plaintiff’s Arguments in Writing