All Lundin PLLC Blogs

Appellate Division, Second Department Courthouse

Motion for Renewal Based on Change in Law Must be Made Before the Time to Appeal the Final Judgment Expires

On December 3, 2025, the Second Department issued a decision in Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v. Sposato, 2025 NY Slip Op. 06752, holding that a motion for renewal based on a change of law must be made before the time to appeal the final judgment expires . . . Continue reading Motion for Renewal Based on Change in Law Must be Made Before the Time to Appeal the Final Judgment Expires

Appellate Division, Second Department Courthouse

Person Who Acquired Ownership LLC Interest did not Also Become Member or Have Standing to Bring Derivative Action

On November 26, 2025, the Second Department issued a decision in Kober v. Nestampower, 2025 NY Slip Op. 06609, holding that a person who acquired an ownership interest in a limited liability company did not also become a member or have standing to bring a derivative action . . . Continue reading Person Who Acquired Ownership LLC Interest did not Also Become Member or Have Standing to Bring Derivative Action

Appellate Division, Second Department Courthouse

Court Properly Ordered $20.5 Million Undertaking as Condition of Vacating Notice of Pendency

On November 19, 2025, the Second Department issued a decision in American Premium Realty Group, LLC v. 37-19 Realty, Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op. 06301, affirming that imposition of a $20.5 million undertaking as a condition of vacating a notice of pendency . . . Continue reading Court Properly Ordered $20.5 Million Undertaking as Condition of Vacating Notice of Pendency

Appellate Division First Department Courthouse

Sanction Inappropriate Because of Insufficient Evidence of Intentional Refusal to Provide Discovery

On November 20, 2025, the First Department issued a decision in Sherman v. Zampella, 2025 NY Slip Op. 06397, holding that a discovery sanction was inappropriate because of insufficient evidence of an intentional refusal to provide discovery . . . Continue reading Sanction Inappropriate Because of Insufficient Evidence of Intentional Refusal to Provide Discovery

Appellate Division First Department Courthouse

That Document Contains Confidentiality Provision is Insufficient Justification for Sealing

On November 3, 2025, Justice Masley of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in F21 IPCO, LLC v. Alameda DC, 2025 NY Slip Op. 34215(U), holding that the fact that a document contains a confidentiality provision is an insufficient basis for sealing it . . . Continue reading That Document Contains Confidentiality Provision is Insufficient Justification for Sealing