Motion to Extend Time to Serve Properly Denied for Failure to Show Either Good Cause or Interests of Justice

Motion to Extend Time to Serve Properly Denied for Failure to Show Either Good Cause or Interests of Justice

On April 2, 2025, the Second Department issued a decision in OneWest Bank, FSB v. Singer, 2025 NY Slip Op. 01940, holding that a motion to extend time to serve was properly declined for failure to show either good cause or that the extension was in the interests of justice . . . Continue reading Motion to Extend Time to Serve Properly Denied for Failure to Show Either Good Cause or Interests of Justice

Failure to Meet the Timing Requirements for Service by Publication is Jurisdictional Defect

Failure to Meet the Timing Requirements for Service by Publication is Jurisdictional Defect

On March 22, 2025, Justice Masley of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Bangladesh Bank v. Rizal Commercial Banking Corp., 2025 NY Slip Op. 30944(U), holding that the failure to meeting the timing requirements for service by publication is a jurisdictional defect . . . Continue reading Failure to Meet the Timing Requirements for Service by Publication is Jurisdictional Defect

Opposing Counsel’s Past Practice of Accepting Service by E-mail Did Not Constitute Agreement to Accept Such Service in New Proceeding

Opposing Counsel’s Past Practice of Accepting Service by E-mail Did Not Constitute Agreement to Accept Such Service in New Proceeding

On March 13, 2025, the First Department issued a decision in Matter of Shasha v. Malkin, 2025 NY Slip Op. 01434, holding that opposing counsel’s past practice of accepting service by e-mail did not constitute agreement to accept such service in a new proceeding . . . Continue reading Opposing Counsel’s Past Practice of Accepting Service by E-mail Did Not Constitute Agreement to Accept Such Service in New Proceeding

Defendant’s Affidavit Showing That She Did Not Live at Address Where Service Was Made Requires Hearing on Service

Defendant’s Affidavit Showing That She Did Not Live at Address Where Service Was Made Requires Hearing on Service

On November 13, 2024, the Second Department issued a decision in U.S. Bank N.A. v. Henry, 2024 NY Slip Op. 05555, holding that a defendant’s affidavit showing that she did not live at the address where service was made required a traverse hearing on service . . . Continue reading Defendant’s Affidavit Showing That She Did Not Live at Address Where Service Was Made Requires Hearing on Service