Motion to Amend to Add Defendants Made After Close of Discovery Denied as Untimely

Motion to Amend to Add Defendants Made After Close of Discovery Denied as Untimely

On November 25, 2024, Justice Ruchelsman of the Kings County Commercial Division issued a decision in Carloha, Inc. v. DC Nice Car, Inc., 2024 NY Slip Op. 34176(U), denying a motion to amend to add additional defendants made after the close of discovery as untimely . . . Continue reading Motion to Amend to Add Defendants Made After Close of Discovery Denied as Untimely

That Documents Were Designated Confidential Under a Confidentiality Order Insufficient to Justify Sealing

That Documents Were Designated Confidential Under a Confidentiality Order Insufficient to Justify Sealing

On December 4, 2024, Justice Cohen of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Avenue Capital Mgt. II, L.P. v. Chubb European Group S.E., 2024 NY Slip Op. 34296(U), holding that the fact that documents were designated confidential under a confidentiality order is insufficient, by itself, to justify sealing . . . Continue reading That Documents Were Designated Confidential Under a Confidentiality Order Insufficient to Justify Sealing

Bringing a Lawsuit in New York is not Doing Business Here for Purposes of LLC Law 802 and 808 or BCL 1312

Bringing a Lawsuit in New York is not Doing Business Here for Purposes of LLC Law 802 and 808 or BCL 1312

On November 25, 2024, Justice Patel of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in OCFBrook Holdings, LLC v. TKS Brooklyn Ctr. Holding, LLC, 2024 NY Slip Op. 51611(U), holding that bringing a lawsuit in New York is not doing business here for purposes of LLC Law 802 and 808 or BCL 1312 . . . Continue reading Bringing a Lawsuit in New York is not Doing Business Here for Purposes of LLC Law 802 and 808 or BCL 1312

Consolidation Based on Overlapping Discovery Denied Due to Insufficiently Similar Questions of Law or Fact

Consolidation Based on Overlapping Discovery Denied Due to Insufficiently Similar Questions of Law or Fact

On October 8, 2024, Justice Ruchelsman of the Kings County Commercial Division issued a decision in Harkins v. Stern, 2024 NY Slip Op. 33599(U), denying a motion for consolidation because of overlapping discovery where there were insufficiently similar questions of law or fact . . . Continue reading Consolidation Based on Overlapping Discovery Denied Due to Insufficiently Similar Questions of Law or Fact

Claim That Cannot Survive Summary Judgment Lacks a Substantial Basis Under New York’s Anti-SLAPP Law

Claim That Cannot Survive Summary Judgment Lacks a Substantial Basis Under New York’s Anti-SLAPP Law

On October 7, 2024, Justice Schecter of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in TRB Acquisitions LLC v. Yedid, 2024 NY Slip Op. 33565(U), holding that a claim that cannot survive summary judgment lacks a substantial basis under New York’s anti-SLAPP law . . . Continue reading Claim That Cannot Survive Summary Judgment Lacks a Substantial Basis Under New York’s Anti-SLAPP Law