All Lundin PLLC Blogs

Appellate Division First Department Courthouse

Contract Not Repudiated Absent Positive and Unequivocal Expression of Intent not to Perform

On April 25, 2023, the First Department issued a decision in Lee v. Whayoun Jun, 2023 NY Slip Op. 02080, holding that plaintiffs did not repudiate a contract because they did not positively and unequivocally express an intent not to perform their obligations . . . Continue reading Contract Not Repudiated Absent Positive and Unequivocal Expression of Intent not to Perform

Appellate Division First Department Courthouse

That Privileged Communication Contains Relevant Information does not Place Contents at Issue

On April 27, 2023, the First Department issued a decision in Talos Capital Designated Activity Co. v. 257 Church Holdings LLC, 2023 NY Slip Op. 02196, holding that a privileged communication may contain information relevant to the issues being litigated, does not, without more, place the contents of the privileged communication itself at issue . . . Continue reading That Privileged Communication Contains Relevant Information does not Place Contents at Issue

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

Failure Timely to Object to Form of Information Subpoena Waived Objections

On April 17, 2023, Justice Crane of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Lantern Endowment Partners, LP v. Bluefin Servicing Ltd., 2023 NY Slip Op. 31240(U), holding that the failure timely to the form of an information subpoena waived any objections to the subpoena . . . Continue reading Failure Timely to Object to Form of Information Subpoena Waived Objections

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

Professional Acting Within Scope of Duties Not Liable for Aiding and Abetting

On April 10, 2023, Justice Chan of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Prime Props. (USA) LLC v. Kefalas, 2023 NY Slip Op. 31203(U), holding that a professional acting within the scope of his or her duties could not be liable for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty . . . Continue reading Professional Acting Within Scope of Duties Not Liable for Aiding and Abetting