All Lundin PLLC Blogs

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

Plaintiffs Bound by Arbitration Provision Added to Online User Agreement

On September 7, 2023, Justice Borrok of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Chablaney v. Gemini Trust Co., LLC, 2023 NY Slip Op. 33127(U), holding that plaintiffs were bound by the terms of an online user agreement containing an arbitration provision . . . Continue reading Plaintiffs Bound by Arbitration Provision Added to Online User Agreement

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

New York Court Has Jurisdiction to Decide Ownership Dispute Under Delaware General Corporation Law 205

On September 5, 2023, Justice Cohen of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Owen v. Array US, Inc., 2023 NY Slip Op, 33056(U), holding that a New York court has jurisdiction to decide a stock ownership dispute under Delaware General Corporation Law Section 205 . . . Continue reading New York Court Has Jurisdiction to Decide Ownership Dispute Under Delaware General Corporation Law 205

Court Refuses to Enforce Choice of Law Provision That Would Have Saved Contract that was Usurious Under New York Law

On September 5, 2023, Justice Doyle of the 7th Judicial District Commercial Division issued a decision in Samson Lending LLC v. Greenfield Mgt. LLC, 2023 NY Slip Op. 23267, refusing to enforce a choice of law provision that would have saved a contract that was usurious under New York law . . . Continue reading Court Refuses to Enforce Choice of Law Provision That Would Have Saved Contract that was Usurious Under New York Law

New York County Courthouse (Justices Borrok, Chan, Sohen, Crane, Masley, Ostrager, Reed and Schecter)

Court Rejects Champerty Defense Where Plaintiffs Had Purchased Defaulted Bonds with the Intention of Suing to Collect on Them

On August 28, 2023, Justice Crane of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Fortelus Funds Invs. Trust v. Hellas Telecom. (Luxembourg) II SCA, 2023 NY Slip Op. 32978(U), rejecting a champerty defense where the plaintiffs had purchased defaulted bonds with the intention of suing to collect on them . . . Continue reading Court Rejects Champerty Defense Where Plaintiffs Had Purchased Defaulted Bonds with the Intention of Suing to Collect on Them