Court Did Not Err in Sanctioning Counsel for Improper Response to Inadvertent Production of Privileged Material

Court Did Not Err in Sanctioning Counsel for Improper Response to Inadvertent Production of Privileged Material

On May 30, 2024, the First Department issued a decision in Pursuit Credit Special Opportunity Fund, L.P. v. Krunchcash, LLC, 2024 NY Slip Op. 02996, holding that the trial court did not err in sanctioning counsel for its improper response to an opponent’s inadvertent production of privileged information . . . Continue reading Court Did Not Err in Sanctioning Counsel for Improper Response to Inadvertent Production of Privileged Material

Corporate Officers Acting in Bad Faith and Outside Scope of Duties Can Be Held Liable for Actions Taken in Corporation’s Name

Corporate Officers Acting in Bad Faith and Outside Scope of Duties Can Be Held Liable for Actions Taken in Corporation’s Name

On May 30, 2024, the First Department issued a decision in Manhattan Chrystie St. Dev. Fund, LLC v. 215 Chrystie Invs. LLC, 2024 NY Slip Op. 02989, holding that corporate officers acting in bad faith and outside the scope of their duties could be held liable for actions taken in corporation’s name . . . Continue reading Corporate Officers Acting in Bad Faith and Outside Scope of Duties Can Be Held Liable for Actions Taken in Corporation’s Name

Where There is a Question Over the Existence of a Contract, Plaintiff Can Assert Both Unjust Enrichment and Contract Claims

Where There is a Question Over the Existence of a Contract, Plaintiff Can Assert Both Unjust Enrichment and Contract Claims

On May 30, 2024, the First Department issued a decision in 110 NC LLC v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2024 NY Slip Op. 02974, holding that when there is a question regarding the existence of a contract, a plaintiff can assert both unjust enrichment and breach of contract claims . . . Continue reading Where There is a Question Over the Existence of a Contract, Plaintiff Can Assert Both Unjust Enrichment and Contract Claims