Equity-Based Compensation Not Wages Within the Meaning of Labor Law § 190(1)

On October 13, 2022, the First Department issued a decision in Molnar v. Greentech Capital Advisors, L.P., 2022 NY Slip Op. 05757, holding that equity-based compensation did not constitute “wages” within the meaning of Labor Law § 190(1), explaining:

Plaintiff failed to state a claim for violation of article 6 of the Labor Law, as her equity-based compensation did not constitute “wages” within the meaning of Labor Law § 190(1). The ultimate value of plaintiff’s equity-based compensation was contingent on the company’s future market value, and thus, was dependent, at least in part, on the financial success of the business enterprise. As a result, the compensation that plaintiff seeks to recover is a form of incentive compensation in the nature of a profit-sharing arrangement. However, Labor Law article 6 contemplates an entirely different type of compensation — that is, compensation directly related to an employee’s individual performance, as distinct from compensation based on the performance of the entire business enterprise.

(Internal citations omitted).

Stay informed!
Sign up for email alerts and notifications here.
Read more about our Complex Commercial Litigation practice.