Skip to content
Lundin PLLC
Menu
  • Practice
    • Structured Finance Litigation
    • Complex Commercial Litigation
    • Securities Whistleblower Complaints
      • AML Whistleblower Reward Program
      • CFTC Whistleblower Reward Program
      • SEC Whistleblower Reward Program
      • DOJ Corporate Whistleblower Award Pilot Program
      • Whistleblower Reward Programs: How to File a Complaint
      • Qui Tam Lawsuits & the False Claims Act
      • Ontario Securities Commission Whistleblower Reward Program
  • About Us
  • Team
    • John M. Lundin
    • Alexandra M.C. Douglas
    • Niall D. Ó Murchadha
    • Noelle Kim
    • Valbona Demiraj
  • Blogs
    • ABS Update
    • Commercial Case Notes
      • Transfer Order Database
    • Manipulation Monitor
    • Whistleblower Write-Up
      • Whistleblower Order Database
      • Whistleblower Awards
  • Contact

ABS Update

ABS Updates are brief notes on developing events relating to structured finance litigation

Home » ABS Update » Page 5
A Busy Week in the ABS World
ABS Update

A Busy Week in the ABS World

This has been a busy week in ABS news. The Court of Appeals heard oral argument in U.S. Bank v. DLJ on Tuesday. I will post links to the video Continue reading A Busy Week in the ABS World

Court of Appeals to Hear Reargument in U.S. Bank v. DLJ
ABS Update / Commercial Case Notes / Put-Back Actions / Statute of Limitation/Laches

Court of Appeals to Hear Reargument in U.S. Bank v. DLJ

On February 8, 2022, the Court of Appeals will hear reargument in U.S. Bank National Association v DLJ, APL-2020-18. The case issue statement describes the issues as: Contracts–Breach or Performance Continue reading Court of Appeals to Hear Reargument in U.S. Bank v. DLJ

Phoenix Light v. BoNYM Dismissed for Lack of Standing
ABS Update / Claims Against Trustees

Phoenix Light v. BoNYM Dismissed for Lack of Standing

Relying on the Second Circuit’s October 2021 decision in Phoenix Light v. U.S. Bank, which held that Phoenix Light lacked standing to sue U.S. Bank, the S.D.N.Y. dismissed Phoenix Light’s Continue reading Phoenix Light v. BoNYM Dismissed for Lack of Standing

NCUA Settles with HSBC
ABS Update / Claims Against Trustees

NCUA Settles with HSBC

NCUA and HSBC have agreed to settle NCUA’s trustee claims against HSBC.

TIPs and a Trustee Decision
ABS Update / Claims Against Trustees

TIPs and a Trustee Decision

Here are two recently-filed TIP/Article 77 proceedings:Deutsche Bank has filed a trust instruction proceeding in Orange County, CA regarding the termination of seven INDX trusts: 2004-AR8, 2004-AR14, 2005-AR6, 2005-AR10, 2005-AR18, Continue reading TIPs and a Trustee Decision

RMBS Trustee Seeks Guidance on Forborne/Deferred Principal in Optional Terminations
ABS Update / Cleanup Calls

RMBS Trustee Seeks Guidance on Forborne/Deferred Principal in Optional Terminations

Maclean Amlalo of the Oakleaf Group recently published an analysis for a recent trust instruction proceeding brought by Deutsche Bank regarding optional terminations.

RMBS Optional Terminations: A Closer Look into Forbearance Underpayments
ABS Update / Cleanup Calls

RMBS Optional Terminations: A Closer Look into Forbearance Underpayments

Maclean Amlalo of the Oakleaf Group recently published an analysis of trust termination underpayments.

U.S. RMBS Market Prepares for the Cessation of LIBOR
ABS Update / LIBOR Transition

U.S. RMBS Market Prepares for the Cessation of LIBOR

Christine Brunie of the Oakleaf Group recently published a paper on LIBOR transition.

RMBS Trust Termination: Cleanup Call & Potential Conflicts
ABS Update / Cleanup Calls

RMBS Trust Termination: Cleanup Call & Potential Conflicts

Maclean Amlalo of the Oakleaf Group recently published an analysis of trust terminations and potential conflicts.

JPM Article 77 Decision Affirmed
ABS Update

JPM Article 77 Decision Affirmed

Today, the First Department affirmed all aspects of the JPM Article 77 decision by Justice Friedman. Continue reading JPM Article 77 Decision Affirmed

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts

Recent Posts

  • Non-Party to PSA May Still Invoke the PSA’s No-Action Clause
  • Court Analyzes Investor’s Standing When Governing Agreement Says That Registered Owner, not Beneficial Owner, Can Sue
  • No-Action Clause Did Not Bar Claim Based on Denial of Plaintiff’s Rights Listed in the Indenture
  • Court Did Not Abuse its Discretion in Directing RMBS Trustee to Accept Settlement
  • No Action Clause Does Not Bar Claims When Demand on the Clause’s Notice Party Would be Futile

Abs Update Categories

  • Champerty (5)
  • Claims Against Trustees (19)
  • Cleanup Calls (6)
  • CMBS (2)
  • LIBOR Transition (2)
  • Put-Back Actions (24)
  • Sampling (3)
  • Privacy Policy
  • Stay Informed
  • Terms and Conditions
Attorney Advertising

Lundin PLLC | 405 Lexington Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, NY 10174 | (212) 541-2402

Copyright © 2026 Lundin PLLC – OnePress theme by FameThemes