In-House Counsel That Has Not Appeared in an Action Cannot be the Subject of a Motion for Disqualification

In-House Counsel That Has Not Appeared in an Action Cannot be the Subject of a Motion for Disqualification

On April 17, 2023, Justice Ruchelsman of the Kings County Commercial Division issued a decision in Joseph v. Rassi, 2023 NY Slip Op. 31261(U), holding that in-house counsel that has not appeared in an action cannot be the subject of a motion for disqualification . . . Continue reading In-House Counsel That Has Not Appeared in an Action Cannot be the Subject of a Motion for Disqualification

Nail and Mail Service Inadequate for Lack of Attempt to Service at the Defendant’s Business Address

Nail and Mail Service Inadequate for Lack of Attempt to Service at the Defendant’s Business Address

On April 17, 2023, Justice Ruchelsman of the Kings County Commercial Division issued a decision in Goldman Sachs Bank USA v. Wagschal, 2023 NY Slip Op. 31263(U), holding that nail and mail service was inadequate because the process server failed to attempt service at the defendant’s business address . . . Continue reading Nail and Mail Service Inadequate for Lack of Attempt to Service at the Defendant’s Business Address

That Plaintiff Read an Allegedly Negligently Drafted Agreement Does Not Bar a Legal Malpractice Claim

That Plaintiff Read an Allegedly Negligently Drafted Agreement Does Not Bar a Legal Malpractice Claim

On May 2, 2023, Justice Chan of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Prospect Capital Corp. v. Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, 2023 NY Slip Op. 31505(U), holding that a plaintiff allegedly read a negligently drafted agreement does not bar a malpractice claim regarding the agreement . . . Continue reading That Plaintiff Read an Allegedly Negligently Drafted Agreement Does Not Bar a Legal Malpractice Claim

Promissory Estoppel Claim Fails Because Plaintiff’s Actions Were Not Unequivocally Referable to the Alleged Promise

Promissory Estoppel Claim Fails Because Plaintiff’s Actions Were Not Unequivocally Referable to the Alleged Promise

On May 4, 2023, Justice Boddie of the Kings County Commercial Division issued a decision in ONH 14 53rd ST, LLC v. TPG RE Fin. 2, Ltd., 2023 NY Slip Op.. 50421(U), holding that a promissory estoppel claim failed because the plaintiff’s actions were not unequivocally referable to the alleged promise . . . Continue reading Promissory Estoppel Claim Fails Because Plaintiff’s Actions Were Not Unequivocally Referable to the Alleged Promise